I would like to hear one logistical argument on why gays shouldn't be allowed to serve in the military. In most arguments, I hear a lot of bullshit about how relationships can be formed and it's not as safe and blah, blah, blah. That argument might hold weight if women weren't getting knocked up in the barracks. But that's a non issue right? (well, probably not to the husbands and wives that are betrayed, but that's another story)
Is it just possible that Gays are not wanted in the military, serving our country, DYING for our country, because you are scared one of them might see you bent over holding a rifle and not be able to overcome the lust he feels for you, and he might jump you right then and there? Maybe a replay of Deliverance in the Army barracks showers?
Listen up Bubba, you aren't that hot. And if the girls aren't tripping over themselves to tap that, George Michael isn't likely to think your that hot either. And he has better manners and probably exhibits better self control than you do too. While you think the word No means "convince me otherwise", he actually hears No. Hmmm...
Seems to me, you might be projecting your own issues on to him.